" /> Alpaca Burger Forum: 2005 Archives

« 2005 | Main | 2005 »

30, 2005

Transitional post

This is just a housekeeping item, really, which we need to use to easily demark a breaking point in the archives, so we can quickly look and see that 'prior to here is such-and-such and following it is thus-and-so.' Not much of interest for the casual visitor (the only kind we accept) I'm afraid.

So thanks for stopping in, please enjoy your day.

I think some unexpected back-of-the-house stuff we've been able to get done recently is going to have a positive impact here, and there's a faint possibility of this blog not sucking so much in the future. Or at least not with such consistency.

We do reserve the right to publish really sucky posts when conditions warrant it - make no mistake about that. It's still a free country last time I checked. Things on the whole could be getting better, though. More later.

29, 2005

Good president, good speech.

This is why all the hard work had to be done during the 2004 campaign: why we made the phone calls and leafleted the doors, why we attended the meetings and sent in the contributions, why we each played our respective roles, however small, to help cut through the fog of lies and change a few minds:

The terrorists, both foreign and Iraqi, failed to stop the transfer of sovereignty. They failed to break our coalition and force a mass withdrawal by our allies. They failed to incite an Iraqi civil war. They failed to prevent free elections. They failed to stop the formation of a democratic Iraqi government that represents all of Iraq's diverse population. And they failed to stop Iraqis from signing up in large numbers with the police forces and the army to defend their new democracy.

The lesson of this experience is clear: The terrorists can kill the innocent but they cannot stop the advance of freedom. The only way our enemies can succeed is if we forget the lessons of September 11, if we abandon the Iraqi people to men like Zarqawi and if we yield the future of the Middle East to men like bin Laden. For the sake of our nation's security, this will not happen on my watch.

We've raised questions and expressed doubt about this Administration's astuteness, communications skills, and strategy - most recently, fairly recently in fact - but the choice in November 2004 was a clear one. And, allowing for the fact there are major missteps in the execution of every war, chances are many of our doubts will be proven unfounded. (Many, but -er - probably not all.)

Yes, threats remain on the horizon, perhaps not so distant.

But overall: The right man is in the Oval Office.

28, 2005

Poetic justice sought for 'Kelo' co-signer Souter

From an errant posting at Lucianne - I don't know who these guys are, or whether anyone should be sending them money, but if they are legit they can count on a check from me (and I bet Ed of MonkeyWatch would be on board, among others):

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land...

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans...

Is this a great country, or what?

George Soros to help solve baseball's antitrust problem?

This is one of those deals where it's kind of hard to know what to wish for:

As we noted here and here, Major League Baseball's antitrust exemption is a load of crap, if you'll pardon my french; and Baltimore Orioles owner Peter Angelos' ownership of the majority of television revenues of the Washington Nationals is an even bigger pile.

Well, the recent news just makes the whole thing confusing.

Republicans in Congress threatened Major League Baseball on Monday with repeal of its antitrust exemption if billionaire financier George Soros is involved in buying the Washington Nationals....

So...if big blowhard Democratic partisan George Soros horns in on the ownership of the Nats, then baseball might have some sunshine cast on its antitrust exemption, which could help pull the rug out from under big blowhard Democratic partisan Peter Angelos. Soros ends up with a piece of the Nats and Angelos perhaps takes one in the neck?

Tough, tough call, and I'm not sure I fully understand the ramifications, and I'm too busy right now to think about it any further.

Hey Natster, you got a bead on this by any chance?

We shall defeat them with our paganism!

Ha! Another blow against those familiar, wacky terrorist ne'er-do-wells:

Perhaps the ultimate solution is none other than the power which has been with us Americans all along: Our deap-seated paganism, as demonstrated by the fine folks running Motel Gitmo:

...a female interrogator took an unusual approach to wear down a detainee, reading a Harry Potter book aloud for hours. He turned his back and put his hands over his ears.

Y'know, thinking outside the 'Christian-Muslim' box may be just what this conflict needs. The idea that the concepts of 'modern Western civilization' are the cure-all for the sick, seventh-century bastards we're now encountering might be a stilted paradigm. We have armies of tree-loving; Western-Civ-hating; burka-eschewing; rarely showered; hairy, exposed arm-pitted, can-I-borrow-your-'deo'? smelly hippie Wiccan chicks. And I bet just a few such lasses could make a big difference if given license to minister to the Abduls and Samis with some good druid theology.

26, 2005

Former Iraq hostage going after his captors

Now THAT'S what I'm talkin' about...

A hostage held alongside Australian Douglas Wood in Iraq has hired bounty hunters to track down his former captors, promising to eliminate them one by one.

Swede Ulf Hjertstrom, who was held for several weeks with Mr Wood in Baghdad, was released by his kidnappers on May 30...

"I have now put some people to work to find these bastards," he told the Ten Network today.

"I invested about $50,000 so far and we will get them one by one."

God love the Aussies. That's a spirit that wins wars; it's the attitude that says the foe shall be defeated by whatever means necessary, even if it's expensive. It's the spirit that would have more air strikes and more troops on the ground in Iraq, a spirit I'd like to see more of from the Bush administration.

Good on ye, mate.

25, 2005

Report from hard knocks U.

Bouncer guy has a bit of a grit-of-reality tale to relate. The subject matter:

This is New York City. The major leagues. You never, ever know whom you're fucking with here. Ever. That's why people get murdered.

If you read blogs, you should be reading this one. It's what the medium is all about.

Pissed off about 'Kelo'?

...who ya gonna call to fix the Eminent Domain snafu - call the Castle Coalition.

Right now, there is a tremendous momentum against this abuse of power, and we ask each of you to begin organizing to change the law in your city or county or state. The Castle Coalition will help you write the language, but now is the time to start organizing your friends and neighbors.

So sign up now to make a difference!

A Capital day for a stroll

I got called from the cozy suburbs into the Frightening City today, to help make the world a better place.

More specifically, I was part of a focus group evaluating a new Web site - or 'revised', rather - for a prominent conservative organization.

I'm sworn to 'secrecy', an oath I've never taken before so I'm not entirely familiar with the implications, but I will say about this not-to-be-named site: It will be a good one. Information and activism all tied together. If you are a conservative looking for resources to help make a difference in the world, please keep checking back here, for updates on the new site, after the unveiling of which you can return to the familiar practice of NEVER checking back here. But till then, check back.

In the focus group I somehow got tossed into the "young conservative adult" demographic (suckers!) so my compatriots were a bunch of bright, youthful DC-area conservatives, and let me tell you - we've got a bunch of young Good Guys And Gals here in DC. This bodes well.

Normally I don't much care to hear what my fellow citizens have to say, because I am a cranky, rather impatient old salt, and on the whole I think they like to hear themselves talk a bit much, but these kids were ok and very polite. I think TownHall the conservative organization in question will be well served by the input they received this afternoon.

After the meeting, I took the long way back to Metro and took in some of the scintillating sights of the nation's capital.

First, the Bush House. No matter how much anyone out there might hate America, they must be impressed by the understated elegance of our leaders' accommodations.

Bush House

Second, across the street at Lafayette Park, the familiar rabble rousers. Well, make that 'rouser' - singular. She sounded Slavic; she would rouse herself whenever a group of tourists wandered across the street to her little exposition, then she'd hold up her signs with photos of injured children and repeat in very high-pitched broken English: "Bush is killer! Bush want nuclear war! Yes, yes Bush nuclear weapons, nuclear war!" Protesting the infamous George W. Bush nuclear proliferation schemes: Apparently she has maintained this vigil since approximately 1981.

protester

This was the sole protester in Lafayette Park, the rest of the Angry Left presumably having departed early to Dupont Circle for some beers, nachos and pool, leaving this poor old woman to do a young man's work.

Finally, I stumbled upon the REAL troublemakers in DC this fine evening. Creepy, they was, and obviously gearing up for a scuffle. We tourists all gave them a wide berth.

Segway GANG

They glide silently over the ribbons of pavement, head and shoulders above the rest of us, discernable only by the shadow they cast, the faint "whoosh!" as they pass and the unmistakable scent of sandalwood in their wake.

Chamois cloths in their pockets. Humming Swiss folk tunes. Winking at panhandlers. Segway gangs. Oh yes, there's trouble a brewin', I can sense it.

24, 2005

More Fox shilling for the GOP

The funny thing about Democratic leaders is, they are so blinded by hate they can't see straight, and consequently they are wrong all the time, and consequently their political power is fading like a March 1960 Life magazine (cover: JFK and Hubert Humphrey) left on the back porch for 45 years.

No wonder Howard Dean made his bold, brilliant observation about Fox News: Somewhere, someone might still have taken him seriously. Such a set of circumstances could not be allowed to stand!

This is the real Fox News:

Myth: Democrats have not supported the War on Terror.

Reality: Democrats first proposed the new Department of Homeland Security and strongly supported our efforts against terrorists in Afghanistan, where Usama bin Laden was believed to be hiding after Sept. 11. A significant number of Democrats voted to authorize force against Saddam, and Democrats have overwhelmingly voted to fund our efforts in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

In reality, as the millions of people who watch Fox News know, it's the only television news outlet that consistently allows divergent points of view. That's the appeal; that's all there is to it. It appeals to conservatives simply because their guys are allowed to talk. Liberals cannot bear this.

Unconventional wisdom from the Democratic rank and file

They're twitching and steaming over at the Rabid Hampster Habitat. (Gee, it's almost like somebody touched a nerve.)

Extreme stress, unfocused rage, and a proclivity for living in a Fun House world add up to some pretty twisted ruminations. Topic of this hour: A staged attack to boost Bush might backfire.

-If Bushaburton staged another attack to try to boost poll numbers it could backfire very badly. It would say that despite 2 wars, countless expenses and deaths that the US wasn't any safer, and that those critics who have been saying that current homeland security isn't good enough were right.

-And the U.S. economy is already teetering...An attack would drop it into something more than a recession. But never put anything past this group of rogues.

-And they would say, "Nobody could EVER have predicted...."Would we buy it? Would we allow once again the Bushites to pretend that they never got any warning that (put attack here) could ever be contemplated.

-Yes And No...Yes, because the country WILL blame him this time. No, because it may be too late and he will use the attack to impose some sort of draconian measures like Marshall Law etc. and start rounding people up.

-And we'd have to JUMP on that particular take, immediately...Because believe me, the wrong wing will take it WAY the other way - about how we all have to unite behind little king schmuck. Can we shout loud enough? Can we storm our reps and insist they grow some backbone? Can we stage sit-ins in their offices? SOMETHING to grab SOMEONE'S attention?

-An attack would do it. So would a draft. But watch for the Abu Ghraib pix....That's when it will hit the fan.

-Possibly.. but what about a staged assassination attempt? We as Americans always seem to glow about someone when they've almost been killed (See: Reagan). If Bush were "shot at", wouldn't that make a lot of Americans back the weasel once again, especially if the assassin was connected to the "terrorists"?

-Karl Rove to agent: "You were supposed to miss!" n/t

-How about this scenario...Abu Gharib photos come out

Huge rioting in the Middle East - I'm talking frightening numbers

Things get so bad in Iraq our troops have to withdraw immediately due to overwhelming conditions leaving Iraq to god knows what but we lose the war

All liberals, Democrats and the ACLU will be publically flogged in the op-ed pages, demonized and blamed because if we had just kept our big mouths shut we would still be fighting terrorist on their own soil - because you know, Dick Cheney said that the insurgency is in it's last throws and we were so close to winning.

Mass paranoia is not a good thing.

23, 2005

Rove for president

[It would be like cutting out the middleman, right?]

Not afraid to call a spade a spade:

"Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers...Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war..."

Rove also denounced Sen. Dick Durbin's comments comparing interrogation at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp to the methods of Nazis and other repressive regimes. He said the statements have been broadcast throughout the Middle East, putting American troops in greater danger. Durbin has since apologized for the remarks.

"No more needs to be said about the motives of liberals," Rove said.

UPDATE: All the backup you need for making the 'liberals are terrorist-hugging weenies' case.

22, 2005

It's...it's...PEOPLE

Whew - this is definitely the weirdest thing I've seen this month, one of those items that's makes you laugh and furrow your brow at the same time. Congrats to Mr. Nuckolls for pulling it off.

The gentleman behind this is actually an old buddy of mine, and probably the only person I've ever met with a more inscrutable, eccentric sense of humor than my own. To get an idea of where he's coming from, his two most recent vacation jaunts have been to the Caucasus and Syria.

The really odd thing is: With this fellow you never do quite know whether he's joking, so you just might be finding this stuff at your local Whole Foods in the not too distant future.

George W. Bush To Do List 7-3-2005

Bolton's our man; if he can't do it, nobody can. Recess appointment, please!

UPDATE: Hmm, maybe not. (But of course we will maintain healthy skepticism about anything emanating from Newsday - we'll have to see how this all shakes out in the coming week).

U.N. Ambassador Saddam Hussein?

Chimpster watch may be on to something:

...if a UN appointment can in some small way repay Papa Saddam for Bush's destruction of his country, murder of his gentle sons, and theft of his oil, then dammit we owe him that much!

Papa was a stern leader, but he did make the trains run on time.

21, 2005

First Mixed Friday Prayers Led by a Woman: Muslim Reactions

A courageous event, as reported at MEMRI:

On March 18, 2005, for the first time on record in the history of Islam, a woman led a mixed congregation of men and women in Friday prayers...

The Friday prayers were held at St. John the Divine Episcopal Church in New York City, after several mosques had refused to host it, due to threats by extremists.

The call to prayer was also performed by a woman, who in addition to setting this precedent did so with her head uncovered. The service was attended by some 100 men and women.

The organizers of the Friday prayers stated that their aim was to set the question of equal rights for women and men on the Muslim agenda, and stressed that women were entitled to be spiritual leaders in Islam...

...and responses revealing the psychology of orthodox Islam:

Dr. Wadud's act aroused great anger amongst Muslim clerics, who rejected the possibility that Islamic jurisprudence permits women to lead men in prayer. They stated that doing so was an innovation forbidden in Islam, since no precedent had been set for it by the Mothers of the Believers – that is, the wives of the Prophet Muhammad during Islam's formative period. Believing Muslims, they claimed, consider a woman's body "lewdness and pudenda" and as such likely to distract the men from their prayers and from the main aim of their worship, that is,submission to God. For this reason, mixed worship is also prohibited, and it is customary for the men to pray in the front of the mosque while the women pray in the rear...

Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, a leading authority in Sunni Islam and a spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, explained to an interviewer on his weekly religious program on Al-Jazeera TV: "It is permitted for a woman to lead members of her household in prayer – as is related in the Hadith about Umm Waraqa, whom the Prophet permitted to lead prayers for the men and women of her household because she remembered the Koran by heart and recited it better than the other members of her household...

"In the eyes of women, a woman is not 'lewdness and pudendum' – but a man might give free rein to his imagination, and think how lovely her figure is, how lovely her body is. Prayer is not the time to engage in human, sexual, or other such musings. Islam is a realistic religion... Islam sees the individual as driven by various urges and motives; thus it has forbidden the woman from leading men in prayer...

"Prayer in Islam is not like prayer in Christianity, in which... people perform their supplication while standing. In Islam, worship has movements: standing, sitting, bending, and bowing. [If a woman leads men in prayer,] she will bow her body before the men – and who says that man is an angel, and that nothing will arise in his mind? These matters are unacceptable and illogical. Islam helps the Muslim to concentrate when he stands before Allah [in prayer], and helps him not to look at anything else...

"From where does the problem of the woman emanate? From the fact that sometimes the heritage of centuries of Islamic backwardness dominates us – centuries in which they caged the woman and forbade her to leave [her home] to pray. [This was] even though the Prophet said, 'Do not stop Allah's female servants from coming to His mosque' – that is, a severe warning that the woman should not be prevented from going to pray..."

It is a fascinating story, worth reading in its entirety.

I'm not a student of Islam, but here's an observation from reading I've done. Orthodox Islam obviously allows little confidence that man (in the strict sense of the word) can control his (ditto) erotic thoughts. In a sense this is 'realistic', as noted in the article, but also a bit overly pessimistic. I think this is one of the reasons so many who leave Islam seem to convert to - atheism.

Orthodox Christianity in a sense is equally pessimistic about any individual's ability to control his or her nature: but therefore proposes the individual's mind must be transformed by the One who is perfect. This understanding of man's (in the generic sense) relationship to God seems to be a step forward and it's too bad more Muslims don't take a closer look at it. Maybe the efforts to reform will lead in this direction.

More good resources on efforts to reform Islam from within are here, here, and here.

20, 2005

We're Motel Gitmo: We'll leave the light on for you

Amid the general wackiness over Gitmo - such as we noted earlier - let's be grateful for those who keep the lights on, beds made and front desk open for business, 24/7/365.

Oh the horror, the horror of Guantanamo Bay

The bozos are out in force, with Dr. Domo Bozo leading the charge:

Mr Clinton joined critics at home and abroad who have singled out the indefinite detention of prisoners without trial and widespread reports of human rights violations at Guantánamo. “It is time that there are no more stories coming out of there about people being abused,” he said.

Mr Clinton said the test for judging whether harsh treatment of terrorist suspects was justified was whether it challenged the “fundamental nature” of American society. If the answer is Yes, you have already given the terrorists a profound victory"....

Amnesty International stoked controversy over Guantánamo Bay by calling it “the gulag of our time”, however it was criticised for drawing a comparison between US military prison and Soviet-era labour camps.

Last week, Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat, got into similar hot water for comparing American interrogation techniques to those employed by Hitler and Stalin's regimes. He later issued a clarification.

The entire anti-U.S. military campaign is, of course, pretty typical for the Democratic leadership:

First, we gave them food, then clean clothing, then supplied all the prisoners with copies of the Koran, one for each prisoner. We gave them the time and place to bathe, to ponder and to pray. Then, it comes out that one, two, maybe three times over a span of three years (that would be more than 1,000 days), some U.S. soldiers, administrators or interrogators may not have treated those Koranic copies with the utmost respect.

Maybe it's time the "progressive" movement is finally relegated to the trash hopper in the spectrum of 21st century thinking:

CONSERVATIVES (and, one trusts, many liberals) have been appalled by Sen. Durbin's comparison last Tuesday, on the Senate floor, between "what Americans had done to prisoners in their control" at Guantanamo and what was done by Nazis, Soviets, and Pol Pot. Conservatives (and, one trusts, many liberals) have also been appalled by Sen. Durbin's non-apology last Friday: "I have learned from my statement that historical parallels can be misused and misunderstood." In other words, Sen. Durbin apparently still believes there could be a proper use and understanding of an "historical parallel" between American soldiers and Nazis.

There are a bunch of other episodes that should have all normal people thinking, "who the hell are these 'liberals' who seem to betray their professed principles whenever such principles might correspond with those of George W. Bush."

But - to name a singular example - anyone who has monitored the "liberal" movement's mute response to the fate of females in Islamic cultures has already figured out that modern liberalism is entirely bogus. "Progressive" political leaders don't truly care about women's rights or sexual equality, they only care about incremental political gains on a short list of issues.

Gang rape, murder of female babies, slavery and clitorodectomy are key elements of cultures existing now, on this Earth, contemporaneous with those of us in America. Liberal leaders - supposed champions of equality - have nothing to say about these barbarisms. That tells you one thing you need to know about modern liberalism.

The inane, hysterical response to U.S. military management of the terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay is the other thing you need to know about modern liberalism. Plenty of liberals believe the U.S. is the Bad Guy in the world and needs to be taken down a notch. This has obvious implications for how liberal leaders would conduct policy if they had political power.

Think about that for a moment.

17, 2005

Mo' Better Gitmo

I'm a big Gitmo supporter the past few years, and now that the too-much-time-on-their-hands, too-few-brainwaves-in-their-heads crowd has seen fit to advertise their jackassery over this issue, I was thinking someone more creative than myself should step up and promote the Good Guy point of view.

And, voila, here it is:

If you have it in you, please go throw them a little Gitmo love.

(Yes, you can also get some neat stuff at the EIB Store but giving money to Rush is like sending Bill Gates a Home Depot gift certificate for Christmas.)

16, 2005

Adieu, adieu, adieu -hoo -hoo -hoo- hoo -hoo

Sudden obligations have arisen and I will henceforth be less available to post the interminable details of my life here at the Alpaca Burger Forum, at least for the next couple months. I have some traveling and family commitments ahead of me. I will be back periodically to report on the herb garden when I'm in town.

I'm certain most of the harvest this year will end up going to those who did not sow - Climacus and Hemmingway, I hope you two bozos appreciate this. You've got some fine condiments developing.

I hear John has received a medical clearance based on some success in reducing his "bad" cholesterol and also a breakthrough in the area of political anger. Presumably, he's got it a little more under control.

Angus will be out there tackling the piscatorial foe. Let 'em live old man, I say, let 'em live!

A happy summer to all of you!

15, 2005

Just stopping in for a spell

Thin posting here of late, due primarily to the fact that your sole narrator has been occupied with the night job as well as the day job.

Nights, we've had the Belmont Stakes and then the Nats playing on the west coast, which has brought mucho business to the watering hole. Days, I'm tasked with buying new phone service and a new phone system for the newcounterculture.com offices high atop Alpaca Burger Towers.

Buying phone service in the current telecom environment is like shopping for software or pharmaceuticals in my Netscape Inbox.

This has left little time for energy or writing. With a night off I believe I shall sit in front of the telly for a spell. Blood Simple is playing, one of those films I watched numerous times in the early 1980s and because of the, er, circumstances in those hazy, crazy days, I have forgotten pretty much everything about it.

I honestly cannot predict whether the film will seem nearly as good now as it did then - hardly anything else does - but I'll see if it holds my interest enough to watch until the end. If not I'll just sleep.

Telecom blogging can wait until I'm recovered enough to report without overwhelming rage.

13, 2005

Unhappy monkey reality news

I read MonkeyWatch because Ed does such a good job providing one of the most useful services of the blogosphere - one which John and Angus tried to provide here, back in the day - which is news aggregator of information we all ought to know but which might otherwise have slipped beneath the radar.

'News aggregator of monkey stories' might at first seem trivial, but in reality fills in essential elements of the landscape we inhabit.

Certainly we all remember this nasty element from earlier in the year:

"The chimps bit the back of his head and penetrated his brain," LaDonna Davis, 61, said. "He has brain swelling."

On Wednesday, he underwent a six-hour surgery to clean and rebuild an eye socket, she said.

The March 3 attack left the former NASCAR driver without a nose, cheek, eye, all of his fingers, his testicles, part of his buttocks and a chewed ankle.

More background is here.

Well, Here is another MonkeyWatch news alert I likely would have missed. This story...just seems to hammer home the fact that the chimp business can be a very unpleasant business:

"Not one place will take him because of the circumstances ... Moe belongs to the Davises," Brauer said. "The Davises are the ones who have to get a place for him. My heart breaks for that chimp..."

'I have been fighting for 30 years to make sure chimpanzees are not used and abused," Brauer said. "I have suffered a tremendous loss and my life has been devastated. My life was broken into a million pieces."

It's the world we live in, folks.

12, 2005

Herb Garden Chronicles, Part 3

[Previous installments: Part 1; Part 2]

The project is going not so bad, with decidedly mixed results. This I will take, gladly.

June 12, 2005

Section 1 – The Fabulous Mint Jungle Section appears to be a runaway success, so much so that I have removed our other mint plant from the Wheezing Potted Herb Section and stuck it in the back of this part. One of the mints is spearmint and the other is peppermint; unfortunately I got them mixed up so definite identification will have to wait for the Great Mint Taste-Off later this summer. Whether we can identify them or not, though, it appears we are going to have a veritable muthaload of mint on our hands.

Section 2 – Not so great with the potted herbs. The basil is stunted at best, and the cilantro has emerged in some mutant, spindly form. I don’t know what’s going on there. These plants are about 25% the size of their brethren in the ground section which were planted at the same time. One year we had a great herb garden in pots; maybe it’s the Meadows Farm Planting Mix – an organic, nitrogen-heavy potting soil mixture. Maybe it’s just too good and a healthy dose of good old Virginia clay soil is what these guys want.

Section 3 – This cilantro is just going nuts, it’s about 2 ½ feet tall - though curiously much less the familiar leaf and more the fern-like flowering portion. I’m clipping the buds and flowers as soon as they appear but am not too worried because it all seems to work great for flavoring purposes. Mystery Herb did not make it and was replaced with old reliable jalapeno pepper. My “dill” has turned out to be actually “fennel” which is much less useful to me. Note to self: Read those little plastic identification signs more carefully.

Section 4 – Sweet basil looks extremely promising. Next to it is a zucchini plant which you can’t see in this picture but is going to be 4-H quality stuff, you mark my words. After a very slow start (May was a pretty cold month around here) I think we’re positioned to be in tomato heaven by mid-summer. I predict much olive oil and mozzarela in our future.

Regarding the hay-induced difficulties of last week, here’s how I dealt with it:

First: Pull up something like 100 hay sprouts leaving only the few hundred more that were in the pre-sprout stage.

Second: Cover the entire ground section with landscape cloth, very meticulously ensuring all of the garden is blanketed and the cloth is wrapped snugly around the base of each plant. I overlapped two pieces on the planting mound to put an extra barrier on any of the malicious invaders.

Third: Cover this with pine mulch, which at the beginning of next season will be rolled up with the landscape cloth and removed, to keep it from leaching nitrogen from the soil.

I love landscape cloth. It helps keep the unwanted life forms Out There where they belong, exhibiting the proper roles of science and nature.

As a side note, the hay fiasco had an unintended benefit. I also used the incredibly fertile, highly seeded straw to cover the numerous bare patches on our front lawn where I mixed in planting mix and grass seed to try and get a more golf-course-like surface. Especially under the large maple tree, the grass was in really shoddy condition, so I applied a bunch of special “shade” mixture. Well, let me tell you, the hay loves it, even in the most sunless areas. My special mixture is doing ok, but where it’s not I’ve got some nice sturdy hay filling it in and when it’s mowed, from a slight distance, you can’t tell it’s not the finest Kentucky bluegrass.

My advice is, if you want your lawn to fill in quickly, treat the bare patches with some nice, non-seedless straw and before you know it you’ll be king of the neighborhood lawn-jock boasting party. Just be sure to keep it mowed, because it does look a little freaky when it gets to five inches or so.

10, 2005

A brush with Quixtar-dom

I don't know why, but scams interest me, sort of like gambling which is one of the few vices that never got its hooks in my soul. As a natural born skeptic, I've only rarely been taken in, yet I do like to learn about how it's done. This site has all you'd want to know and more.

The inspiration for this post came from Florida Cracker: When she's not writing about animals, Duane Allman or all types of human interest stuff, she tends to have a keen eye for the lower life forms among our species.

The part that leapt to my attention was the section on 'multi-level marketing'.

My first contact with Amway was a semi-crazy neighbor who during my youth taught me the meaning of 'party buzz killer'. He could alienate everyone within earshot at any social gathering, regardless of his seemingly genuine closeness to anyone there. Like a one-man relationship wrecking ball, he had no reservations about accosting each successive victim with his rapid-fire, persistent requests to get involved in a compelling business adventure and attend an upcoming meeting at a local hotel. This was some decades ago.

My most recent contact in a similar vein was a year or so ago, when I was shopping for groceries at the local Safeway. A nicely dressed young man approached me in the produce section and said, "Excuse me, but you look familiar. Do you work in graphic design?"

"No," I said, "but I did some of that in the distant past. When are you thinking of?"

"I think it was a few years ago, maybe five or seven. Is your name by any chance Bob?"

"No, it's Winston," I replied.

"Well, maybe I'm mixed up, but you do look very familiar."

I suggested some past affiliations of mine which might identify the common ground, but neither of us could nail down the connection. I searched the old memory banks but definitely could not place him. I related that I had moved on to numerous other technical pursuits since the old days of CorelDraw 1.0 and Ventura Publisher.

Finally he said, "You know, Winston, I'm working for a company now that is really looking to grow in the areas you're experienced in. The financial upside is unbelieveable. I'd love to tell you about it when you have a chance."

Since I sort of felt like I knew the man, still trying to place him from job-related experiences of the past 10 years, I said 'sure' and we agreed to meet a couple days later at a local coffee shop.

I wasn't particularly looking for a job, but what the hey.

When we sat down over coffee, he took out a legal pad and began sketching out an extraordinary business convergence: In the 1950s, two guys I've never heard of, Jay Van Andel and Richard DeVos, blended their expertise in marketing and finding great consumer products, and together become responsible for generating billions of dollars in revenues for thousands of Independent Business Owners (IBOs).

[skipping explanation of IBO concept...]

Long story short: "Now there are thousands of products from the most well known suppliers - ever heard of OfficeMax...Clinique...Este Lauder...many others...? - available through a single shopping network at substantial discounts. Looking into the future, we can see that it won't be long before consumers can do nearly all of their shopping on the Web - and can manage their purchases online through a single Web interface. This will allow volume discounts, preordering, home inventory management. How would your wife like if instead of having to buy cosmetics and household supplies whenever she runs out, she could build a database of items that would be automatically refilled throughout the year?"

"Wow," I say, "that seems like it could be a good idea, being able to offer access to different online stores like a shoppers club. I'm not sure if we're organized enough to have anything automatically refilled, though. But I could see how some people would really be able to use such a service."

"Well, now there is one company - called Quixtar - which allows you to do just that. It's already doing over 22% of all the commerce on the entire Web. Do you have any idea how much money that is? But there's more. You're a tech-savvy guy, so you can probably see where I'm going with this:

"Based on the system developed by Van Andel and DeVos, Quixtar is helping more and more new IBOs earn extra income simply by helping more people find these excellent products on the Web. You get your own portal for shopping, and you can allow others to use it, and you make a commission off every purchase.

"Winston," he asks me,"just by virtue of your ability to use the Internet, how would you like to be able to earn $1,200 a month in your spare time, by meeting new people and introducing them to these products?"

[He writes the figure '$1,200' on the pad.]

"Would that help pay off some bills? Pay for your kid's education? Take a vacation? The people I'm working with all have one thing in common: They are completely out of debt and are socking away extra money every single month. For only about 10 hours a week of work, how would you like to be in that situation?"

"Hmm...some kind of sales, huh?" I say, thinking to myself "I wish I was in my car driving away right now."

"I'm not sure," I say, ever the alpha male, resigned to hearing the rest of the sales pitch. "How exactly does the business side of it work?"

He goes on to describe a unique selling opportunity, which involves great products and wonderful "tools" to help me succeed, such as tapes and books. In fact, there was a fantastic educational conference taking place that weekend in DC where I could get together with hundreds of other IBOs, learning how to make lots of money and become entirely financially independent. Bill Britt himself, one of the most successful sellers in the organization would be there. There were just a few slots open and for only $125 I could still attend.

I finally got an opening to say, "The shopping portal sounds interesting; I'll have to check my schedule about the other part," and we exchanged phone numbers with a promise to speak in a couple days.

I got home and rehashed my adventure for the wife, and in doing so I said something that came to mind: "You know, the whole thing reminds me a lot of this neighbor I had growing up, who basically alienated the entire neighborhood selling Amway."

Then I googled "quixtar" and lo and behold, it IS Amway. Suddenly it all became clear, and the pyramids came tumbling down all around me.

And boy howdy, did the Internet have a bevy of information about it.

When I later talked to my Quixtar guy, I told him that I had a mental block about turning every personal relationship into a business proposition, and therefore wouldn't likely be much help to his organization - but if he ever wanted to get together about the shopping deal, I'd be happy to take a look at the products.

He was noncommital about getting into the product side any time soon, which I later learned is because it's not really about selling products.

I also learned I'd been the object of an established Quixtar sales approach, likely documented in the "tools." For some reason this made me feel a little better about the whole thing, and mildly approving: Hey, a good scam's a good scam. I got to see it up close and it didn't cost me a thing.

(There's much more background here, here, and here.)

Don't get me wrong: I think people who perpetrate scams that rip off the innocent should (and will) burn in hell, and should also receive whatever sort of scorching we can dish up here on Earth. Ripping off the innocent is tragic.

But scams like the pyramid scheme are different, because they require a two-way tango involving on one side a scammer, and on the other, a dope. Ripping off dopes is comic, which to me is sort of entertaining.

And therein lies the essence of irony.

Sidney Goldberg, RIP

Father of Jonah, husband of Lucianne, and wise and prolific author.

Some of his work:

...Has Been Greatly Exaggerated (death of newspapers)

The Myth of the Man (JFK)

Paper of Record Mistakes

Leaning Lexicons

Condolences to the entire Goldberg family.

07, 2005

John Kerry 'genius' myth finally put to bed. Who'd a thunk it?

It's funny because 60 million people already knew it was true.

A whole bunch of us already knew it about Al Gore also, which also was somewhat mirth-inducing.

Bonfire of the Vanities #101

The latest Bonfire gets all medieval on yo' *ss, over at Benedict's.

[And the first mention in our first 18 months of a certain surname incongruity. Congratulations, Ben: We've been trying to tell people for what seems like forever that we're no relation. And it only took us 4 months to notice it ourselves...]

06, 2005

A day at the beach

Hello there, dear readers, I am back for a spell to report on recent activities. As the weather and water temperature warm I tend to spend far more time outdoors than at the keyboard; and if things go according to plan, this coming summer will bring sparse typing indeed.

This weekend I had the pleasure of attending the nuptial ceremony of a couple fine young'uns. A beautiful event it was and quite a nice surprise that old uncle Angus should have been invited.

If any of you young lovebirds in the middle Atlantic coastal area are planning to tie the knot, you could do a lot worse than to hold a wedding at Atlantic Beach, North Carolina.

The setting was sublime, the experience uplifting. It was a lovely display of lovely emotions, from the ritual itself to the narratives and general festivities at the reception. A wedding always means so much in terms of life-reflection to both the participants and the witnesses, but a wedding at the beach adds something more, something tantalizing yet also ineffable. A wedding at the beach also means...

Fishing.

Always keenly aware of such opportunities that may not be immediately evident to the casual wedding guest, I took the necessary precaution of stowing the appropriate hardware in the SUV along with the gifts and clothing. Sure enough, the reception concluded relatively early, and the wonderful spectrum of refreshments ensured that old Uncle Angus would be asleep well before midnight.

It was therefore not much of a stretch to set my phone alarm for 5:30 am - might as well not sleep the day away after such an early bedtime! - and as luck would have it, the previous morning I had persuaded some energetic yard-ape types to fill one of my buckets with sand-flea crabs from the surf line.

It was a short walk to the pier, and this is the sight that greeted me just before 6:00 am Sunday morning.

I was intending to go after pompano - thus the sand fleas - but few were in the area yet (I'm told they should arrive in large numbers in late June. Hmm.) Instead my sand fleas were devoured quickly by the resident pinfish under the pier, and within a half hour I joined the other old salts flinging "Gotcha" plugs and Gator spoons for bluefish and spanish mackerel.

No mackerel showed up, but there were tons of baby blues until about 2 hours after daybreak. The problem for me was I had no desire to kill a cooler full of 12-inch bluefish in order to get a decent family meal's worth of meat. I like bluefish in big steaks cooked on the grill, so I'd just assume let the 12 inchers grow up for a few more years and at least double in size.

Plus, the little buggers are so enthusiastic it's not unusual for a 10-inch "snapper" blue to bite on a 4-inch spoon, and getting that big treble hook out without killing the fish can be a trick. My last one had all three prongs embedded in his mouth; I worked each one out while the little fellow stared at me with his heart beating madly (Yes, fish have heartbeats, just like yours or mine. Well, probably a little steadier than mine.) But I got him back in the water unharmed after a few tense moments, and then decided, enough plugging for me.

I had kept and killed one of the pinfish to use for bait (a split-second beheading, as humane as can be done without a fish-overdose of nembutal). With a couple hours still ahead of me, I set up two bottom rigs to use with different-sized strips of pinfish filet, hoping maybe to attract a flounder, large bluefish, medium-sized shark, or anything else grill-worthy.

This kept me busy the entire remaining time because the pesky pier residents did not let up one bit. If there's anything pinfish like better than sand fleas, it's little pieces of pinfish (hopefully this will mitigate somewhat your horror over the beheading, if that bothered you).

No worthy catches, although my biggest take of the day came - unexpectedly - on my smaller rig. I had cast about 30 feet off the side of the pier and after about 5 minutes the rod tip whipped hard twice, then dove into a deep bend. I quickly grabbed it, set the hook with a big yank backwards, and immediately went into drag-management mode. Whatever it was, pulled real hard. And my already stiff drag setting was not enough because this opponent had my rod bent double and was making it's way slowly toward the pilings. I tightened the drag and attempted to keep the momentum on my side, to keep its head turned toward me and away from the structure.

A couple guys came over and asked "is that a fish or are you snagged?"

I said, "it's a fish, but it feels like a ray or a big catfish because it's pulling pretty hard but..."

A guy finished the sentence for me: "...but it's not doing much."

"Yep."

"You may have to walk it to the beach if it's a real big one. That's what I had to do yesterday."

I looked down the pier and saw the steps to the beach were on the opposite side from the side I had this fish on. I was about to ask, "So how would you get off the pier on this side..." when it broke the surface and, sure enough, it was a skate, but not nearly as big as its fight led me to believe.

We got it up to the deck in a pier net, and here it is:

In Orthodox Jewish circles, this would be considered "unclean." Can you believe it?

I also managed to get this guy back in the water expeditiously, not much worse for the adventure. I'm told some unscrupulous restaurants will use a hollow aluminum net handle to punch nice round "scallops" of meat from the wings and sell them as, well, "scallops," but I'd be more inclined to just go buy some actual scallops than get into the ray-butchering business. Whatever they were put on this earth for, it does not seem exactly clear to me that skates were intended for human food. I think they exist to scare the bejeezus out of little kids who should not be going in the ocean anyway without their parents right there.

I realize the report on the fishing is much more complete than of the wedding: This is no reflection of the relative importance or enjoyability of the events, but is simply because of the fact that one report is much less likely to impinge on necessary privacies. And I think I did a pretty good job respecting the dignity and basic rights of everyone involved. Excepting maybe the pinfish.

Minneapolis smackdown: Sanderson v Boyd, Rounds 1-3

A buddy up in the North Country took issue with his local paper over Mr. Wrong -Paul Krugman - and who should jump into the fray but StarTribune Deputy Editorial Page Editor Jim Boyd, the fellow who helped establish Power Line as one of the most influential blogs.

Here are the first few exchanges:

-----Original Message-----

"Sanderson, Greg" 6/2/2005 3:09:00 PM

Mr. Parry;

Why does the StarTribune continue to publish columns by Paul Krugman even after Daniel Okrent, the New York Time's "Public Editor" (the equivalent of the Star Tribune's Readers Representative), sufficiently discredited him. He accuses Mr. Krugman of "shaping, slicing and selectively citing" facts and data in his opinion columns. Mr. Krugman was exposed by his Public Editor as nothing short of a fraud.

This is quite stunning. And the fact that readers of the Star Tribune are not even made aware of the questionable facts cited in Krugman's columns should be corrected. Perhaps the Star Tribune editors and publisher were not aware of Mr. Krugman's loose facts, and made up comments.

Here is the direct link to the Okrent/Krugman battle

http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/thepubliceditor/

publiceditorswebjournal/index.html?offset=1&fid=.f779788/1

I hope that the Star Tribune stops printing Mr. Krugman's columns. I don't think that it is appropriate for this newspaper to pass along commentary that has been discredited by your colleague at the NY Times.

Sincerely,

Greg Sanderson

-----Original Message-----

From: Jim Boyd [mailto:boyd@startribune.com]

Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 4:08 PM

To: Sanderson, Greg

Subject: Re: Krugman

Okrent's paragraph-long slam of Krugman was an exceedingly cheap shot. He provided not a single example of a fact or figure that Krugman had shaped. He did it in his last column as almost an aside.

Krugman has responded well. Okrent didn't expose Krugman as anything; he did expose himself as a mud slinger.

B. James Boyd

Deputy Editorial Page Editor

Star Tribune

425 Portland Av.

Minneapolis, MN 55488

612-673-4470

boyd@startribune.com

-----Original Message-----

"Sanderson, Greg" 6/3/2005 11:04:57 AM

Mr. Boyd;

I must respectfully disagree with your assessment that your former colleague, Mr. Okrent, is a mud slinger and a cheap shot artist. Mr. Okrent, a self declared liberal Democrat, had grown tired of Mr. Krugman's loose facts. I can image that he grew weary of answering the volume of fact checkers and bloggers who identify incorrect statistics, document inconsistent, cherry picked, and wrongly placed use of data, and in some cases made up information (for example, Krugman literally invented a stock market floor chanting "Kerry! Kerry!").

When the Deputy Editorial Page Editor defends someone as specious and disrespected as Paul Krugman, while at the same time disregards the valid criticism of a respected Ombudsman like Mr. Okrent, as a "cheap shot" and a "mudslinger", you have exposed yourself as the same (which I don't believe was your intention). You stated that Mr. Okrent did not give examples. On the contrary. Follow the full extent of the Okrent criticism, and you will find dozens and dozens of errors. I would urge you to dig deeper before you jump to the conclusion that Mr. Okrent is a mudslinger. His criticisms are valid.

If you want, I would be happy to direct you to the Krugman fact checkers and bloggers upon which I speak.

You have an opportunity to be honest with your readers, and to gain some credibility with many conservatives and moderates who have written off the Star Tribune as the left wing arm of the left wing New York Times. Mr. Krugman is not a credible columnist. If you publish regular corrections to his columns, or drop his column all together, your credibility as a balanced news source goes up. Way up.

Respectfully,

Greg Sanderson

-----Original Message-----

From: Jim Boyd [mailto:boyd@startribune.com]

Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:42 AM

To: Sanderson, Greg

Subject: RE: Krugman

OK: cite one sloppy fact that Okrent cited. Just one.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Sanderson, Greg"

To: "Jim Boyd"

Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:10 PM

Subject: RE: Krugman

Mr. Boyd

> From the NY Times--Mr. Okrent gives examples.

http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/thepubliceditor/

publiceditorswebjournal/index.html?offset=1&fid=.f779788/1

And if you'd like to dig deeper and find dozens of examples:

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200410130936.asp

http://www.poorandstupid.com/

These are just a few.

Mr. Krugman is a perfect illustration of what is so very very wrong on the left today. Sadly, your editorial page has joined the this far left, way-off the mainstream viewpoint. You have an opportunity right now to gain some credibility with people like me who have stopped reading your commentary due to it's predictable leftist support. Liberal Letters to the Editor, on a regular day, outnumber published conservative letters 6:1. Often times much much more. Token occasional conservatives like William Safire and George Will are a start, but not even close to enough. The editorials would be more compelling if there were more sensible debate and viewpoints as opposed to flawed "truths" as opined by Mr. Krugman.

Don't circle your wagons around someone like Paul Krugman. He's like the bad cop being defended by all of the good cops--even though he brings down all of the good cops, they still defend their non-defensible brother.

Respectfully,

Greg Sanderson

Kudos to Greg for taking the initiative to carve out some time and write to an offending local paper, rather than simply banning it from his house as some people - ahem - have done.

We'll pass along any updates.

01, 2005

Another of Al Capone's vaults comes up empty

Although it really has a fascinating back-story, the Deep Throat revelation on the face of it sure is a disappointment for those of my generation who considered this one of the great mysteries of our time (when we were much younger).

The anticlimax - 'Who?!' - is akin to learning JFK was accidentally shot by a couple of drunken bozos plunking pigeons in Dealey Plaza, or Amelia Earhart secretly pulled a U-ey back to California and just tanked for a few decades at a San Francisco coffeehouse.