Michael's Fans:
You know, I don't know why I'm not surprised at this move by WMAL. It makes sense, right? "Let's all be nice to everyone and if one of our hosts says something that someone else does not like, let's FIRE them, instead of protecting their First Amendment right to free speech."
No offense to anyone that works at 630 WMAL, but you all in the leadership at the station should be ashamed of yourselves. You let an extremely honest person be fired, because a hateful group did not like what Michael had to say. This is downright wrong. I am in full support of Michael suing 630 WMAL for at least his lost wages on the grounds of a Free Speech violation on the part of 630 WMAL.
ooooooooooooooooo
It seems to me that it would be a good idea to try to get people like Limbaugh and Hannity to talk about Michael Graham mess.
In the meantime, I recommend Tony Snow in the same time slot on 1160.
ooooooooooooooooo
I totally agree Rush and Sean should talk about Michael. FYI--I can't get reception for Tony's show at work so I listen to Laura Ingraham on 570 during 9-noon.
ooooooooooooooooo
I have fired WMAL altogether. I can get Rush on WBAL (Baltimore) and Sean on WCBM (Baltimore) or XM. And, if I can't pick up the Baltimore broadcast stations for some reason, I will get Rush on podcast before I turn my dial to WMAL again. I will also listen to Tony Snow on WMET (1160) or on XM in Michael's slot.
I'm sorry that Fred and Andy and Chris Core will get caught in this. But the fact is, I cannot trust what I get from WMAL anymore. Whatever I get from them will have to pass a CAIR filter first.
ooooooooooooooooo
We should all email Ibrahim Hooper ihooper@cair-net.org , he had the nerve to call me up when my marketing director emailed him told him to do to Michael’s bold statements we have decided to advertise on WMAL (which now obviously is on hold for good) … he called me up and told me that did I know you have a hate monger working for you.
This is his email to me
From that terrorist sympathizer Hooper
Peace
Here's the e-mail and other info.
Ibrahim Hooper
202-744-7726 (c)
202-488-8787 (o)
Mr. Hooper,
Just thought you guys would like to know. We are now about to sign a deal to start advertising on WMAL. This is a direct result of the Bold comments of Michael Graham.
ooooooooooooooooo
I have forwarded the announcement to as many of the TV/Radio commentators I can think of, Glen Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, etc.
I suggest everyone to do the same too. Keep inundating them so hopefully this can be heard nationally.
ooooooooooooooooo
Will Do…. What has happened to Michael Graham is a travesty… If they can do this to Michael who will they go after next?
ooooooooooooooooo
Fans of Michael Graham,
I too am angry here are some alternatives to WMAL for those of you in Maryland:
WBAL-AM1090
On line at: http://wbal.com
They have:
Chip Franklin – remember him?
Rush Limbaugh
WCBM – AM680
On line at: http://www.wcbm.com/
They have:
G. Gordon Liddy
Sean Hannity
And for fans of Paul Harvey you can get him on line at http://www.paulharvey.com/
Perhaps we need to show WMAL that we know what "Free Speech" and more importantly "Free Listening" are all about.
Stephen C. Yednock Jr.
Seabrook Maryland
ooooooooooooooooo
Do they even have the guts to say anything on the air? I haven't heard anything all morning. Talk about spineless.
ooooooooooooooooo
I suggest that we e-mail WMAL telling them how displeased we are that Michael Graham was fired. Hopefully WMAL will be alarmed by the number of people on this e-mail listing and they will bring him back. I do feel bad for Andy Parks and Fred Grandy. I enjoy their show in the morning so I will continue to support them. After all what is the alternative...Don Imus. Give me a break! As for 9:00 - 12:00, Laura Ingraham is great talk show host and very entertaining.
If the WMAL management team sees that all of us are going to another station then maybe this will pressure them to bring back Michael.
ooooooooooooooooo
Fellow Graham Fans,
In the interest of sharing more information about this incident, the following is an email reply I received this morning in response to my giving them a piece of my mind last night after receiving Mr. Graham's press release. I'm not sure what's true nor am I defending WMAL, just sharing what I received in the interest of sharing information.:
Thank you for your email. I had not heard of Michael's decision until now.
We have given him the option to return to the air. Unfortunately he did not respond and instead has decided to miscast the facts. In addition our discussions with Michael were made independently without discussion or influence by ANY third party.
Again I appreciate you bringing Michael's announcement to my attention.
Chris Berry
President and General Manager
630 WMAL
ooooooooooooooooo
The people on this list will not intimidate WMAL. This story needs some national attention. If Rush, Hannity, O' Reilly, and the rest are all talking about this injustice, maybe we can put a little pressure back onto WMAL to correct their mistake.
ooooooooooooooooo
Fred and Andy are worth staying with WMAL; Chris on the other hand goes which ever way the wind blows. He has no backbone.
ooooooooooooooooo
We should forward this to Jay Sekulow at the American Center for Law and Justice. I cannot seem to find his e-mail address but if any of you have it you should send this story to him. You can also call in on his show: Radio call-in number: 1-800-684-3110 (from 12-12:30 PM EST/EDT.) We should urge Jay to help Michael defend his Freedom of Speech as well as Freedom of the Press. WMAL is allowing CAIR to suppress basic freedoms as well as the truth by having Michael fired for comments the deemed “hate radio”; yet they are not hateful in calling Michael a bigot for noticing a trend? Double Standards?
ooooooooooooooooo
Fellow Former WMAL Listeners,
All morning long I have been reading the e-mail of fellow listeners who are incensed over Michael Graham being fired for his comments made and his refusal to apologize. The overwhelming sentiment that I have read is that people want to switch radio stations. Perhaps we have reached that point. I think there are two points that WMAL management and the other talk show hosts must realize to bring us back.
1. There are two types of people who listen to WMAL. The first type are those who enjoy the programming and the spirited debate over ideas and policies. The second type are those who are opposed to the free exchange of ideas and wish to silence the voices of those who disagree with them. WMAL management has clearly opted to cater to the second type of listener.
2. A discussion so often held on WMAL is how when you give in to terrorists you embolden their activities. Well, when you give in to the complaints of organizations like CAIR you embolden their efforts, too. Now they will feel that they can act to remove any host for any reason in the future. Fred Grandy, Andy Parks, and Chris Core....beware, you could be next.
While I acknowledge that WMAL has the right to set policy that instructs their employees on how to act, I think that WMAL needs to remember what made them successful in the first place. WMAL became successful because they provided an arena in which people could voice their opinions and debate the issues. Their hosts were good at facilitating this interaction. This is what built WMAL. Well now that they're successful they have begun to shy away from their listener base. Perhaps they feel that they are too big to fall. There's an old saying in the south, "dance with who brung you". It was the listeners who enjoyed the programming who made WMAL a success and it is now the listeners who despise WMAL that the management is catering to. I hope the management sees fit to let us know when they have found the desire to appeal to their first listener base and bring back Michael Graham.
ooooooooooooooooo
WMAL:
I have a Marketing Plan. In that plan, I am two steps away from radio advertisements. In light of the recent firing of Michael Graham, your spineless caving in to an outside political organization, and the disrespectful silent treatment towards thousands of your listeners, I will not be advertising with your station.
ooooooooooooooooo
> Thank you for your email. I had not heard of Michael's decision until
> now.
> We have given him the option to return to the air. Unfortunately he did not
> respond and instead has decided to miscast the facts. In addition our
> discussions with Michael were made independently without discussion or
> influence by ANY third party.
> Again I appreciate you bringing Michael's announcement to my
> attention.
I received the same response this morning, so I sent this as a followup:
"Are you therefore asserting that Michael was not required to apologive and participate in a "community-service style outreach effort" in order to be allowed to return to the air?"
Chris Berry's response was:
"I never asked him to use the word APOLOGIZE or say he was sorry. As for additional outreach, I have hoped that he will speak to advertisers who have been concerned along with his colleagues at WMAL. I have NEVER suggested nor would I expect him to speak with others."
ooooooooooooooooo
All,
Heath got it right on point. And, I really appreciated Yvette's timely comments, too. My hours prevented me from listening to Michael, but my wife "did" and quoted him often. WMAL lost a listener in that time slot to Tony Snow. My wife asked me yesterday if I'd heard anything about Michael's situation. I sadly told her just now.
It is a shame, but is it so unexpected, for ABC to succumb to such a radical group. It is pitiful and cowardly. The Terrorists won another battle, but fortunately, not the war!
My prayers are with you Michael!
ooooooooooooooooo
Here is my email to the General Manager. I also sent similar emails to Fred & Andy and Chris Core:
It pains me to do it, but I can not continue to listen to WMAL! This station has caved-in to CAIR, who demanded Michael Graham be punished. WMAL responded by suspending him, but apparently that was not enough. Perhaps physical torture, mutation and imprisonment would have satisfied CAIR. Since we do live in the United States, and freedom of speech is protected, that type of punishment is not an option. Thank God! CAIR would not be satisfied until Michael Graham was fired. No, I do not believe Michael should have been coerced into apologizing or into doing some bogus community outreach program! Those should not have been the terms of his return. He should have been allowed to return after his suspension, period!!
WMAL, you are fired!
ooooooooooooooooo
Folks, I'm right there with ya on all your comments. I'm incensed at WMAL and will not listen any more. Another Rush option for you internet listeners, by the way, is his (and my) home station, KFBK 1530 (www.kfbk.com) in Sacramento, CA--if you stay on after Rush, you'll catch Tom Sullivan, too, who frequently sits in for Rush (and is a little more level-headed than Hannity).
Enough of the radio station ads, though. I must express some concern about the mass emails--I'm delighted to see as many people impassioned by the subject, but I must warn that in this day and age, such mass unprotected emailing is a threat to everyone involved due to spamming, unsecure internet hosts and recipients, and so on and so forth. --Not to mention, it sucks to scroll all the way down past the whole list of recipients (there are quite a few of us, it seems!). If there is enough interest, I will open a livejournal page where people may go to vent their points of view. If people of this community prefer to keep in touch via email, I strongly recommend using the BCC (Blind Carbon Copy) option.
I'd very much like to keep in touch with you all, but I'd also like to keep us all as safe as possible from Internet hazards that can be easily minimized.
Thanks for your passion, your community, and your patience.
ooooooooooooooooo
Dear Michael Fans,
I am currently reading Michaels's book "Banned from public radio"(c1995) which contains some of Michael's columns, from the years 1992 - 1995. I've come to learn in this wonderful book, that in 1995, the whole legislative branch of South Carolina decided to pass a law to ban Michael, at taxpayers expense!
Isn't it amazingly how history repeats itself?
The DC area finally has a local host who is all about conveying the truth and exposing corruption and when things get tough for WMAL, all they can do is bow to to the wrong people and fire him.
To rephrase a quote from another fan:
"This whole thing makes me want to throw up".
By the way, I'm sure I speak for many when I say,
Michael, I hope there's a station somewhere in DC that's really interested in truth, because your voice is needed in Washington DC.
ooooooooooooooooo
I think Michael crossed the line and the station had to make a business decision. You have a choice to not listen and not shop at any of the advertisers of his show or the station. I am sure that Michael was aware of the consequences of his actions. Michael, like many hosts of TV and Radio use their platform to espouse their personal messages which I think are somewhat extreme. I have often wondered whether these positions are to escalate the dialogue on these programs to increase ratings. Either way, generalizations and characterizations of people or groups are dangerous, hurtful and insightful and have no place on the public airwaves.
We need to start learning for ourselves and stop following these one sided, single minded hosts and address issues on our own and make our own decisions.
ooooooooooooooooo
You show your ignorance so blatantly and obviously don’t know it. Keep up the good liberal babble so we can all laugh.
ooooooooooooooooo
Political correctness and bowing to the sensitivities of the Islamic community won't entice the Islamic leadership to fully and unequivocally renounce acts of terror and express their full support of religious tolerance. They simply must be held to that standard. The fact that they have not has only increased the risk to the U.S. and its citizens. I still firmly Michael's comments were a welcome outcry in these times and deserved by the entire Islamic community - both in the US and abroad. Talk about hurtful - what about the murderers in NY, PA, DC, and now London and the FACT that the Islamic leadership around the world has utterly failed to rebuke those who commit murder. If they start murdering in our subways and buses, I am confident that this group will be scrutinized in ways that go beyond the comments of a talk show host.
During this time of war, political correctness is un-American.
ooooooooooooooooo
I am so sorry to see you go. Let me know where you get a new job and I will listen. WMAL did the absolute wrong thing to you and to us. I am insulted. I will not listen to them anymore and will not use any of their advertisers as long as they support WMAL.
ooooooooooooooooo
There is a difference between a radio personality making stupid callous
commentary about Rev. Dr. King's day of recognition and one who poses a
question for discussion (their job) and holds their position on the issue.
A talk show host who changes their view point to satisify the whims of the
enlightened can not hold anyone's interest for long.
How far do we take Political Correctness? Evidently, further than open
discussion and personal opinion. Asking for support to end violence must
not be politically correct.
If a person seen running away from a burning cross is dressed in white
flowing robes with a pointed hat we know it is neither Gandalf nor Jesse
Jackson. Would it be politically correct and unbiased to assume the
person running was Caucasian?
To my knowledge, the term Political Correctness came about during Lennin's
first 5 year plan. It figures.
Lenin also said that by telling a lie often enough it becomes the truth.
My condolences to the person taking over Michael Graham's time slot.
Dittos.